Archive for the ‘Business To Business’ Category

   Next Entries »

Market Research In A Recession

Wednesday, July 29th, 2009


Post to Twitter Post to Facebook Post to LinkedIn

It won’t come as a big shock that the UK market research sector, like the majority of other industry sectors, isn’t recession proof and has been hit, at least to some extent, by the current recession.

The key takeaways from a recent ‘State of the industry survey’ by RSM are as follows:

  • Six out of ten researchers have seen their budgets decline and only one in 20 has experienced an increase
  • Research activity in most sectors is expected to experience a net decline, most significantly in the automotive and media sectors
  • Most research methods will feel the impact of recession, with face-to-face hit hardest (48% expect to spend less on face-to-face research and only 6% expect to spend more).
  • Web-based data collection will continue to increase, although at a reduced rate compared to previous years.
  • The current discipline of carefully prioritising expenditure and ensuring the best possible ROI is expected by some to become common practice

This particular piece of research got us talking internally and we came up with the following trends that we have seen within our world at B2B International:

1. There are less market research specialists in corporates than ever before

Gone are the days when every corporate had a market research manager. Increasingly we are being commissioned by non-market research specialists — marketing managers, product managers, marketing directors and the like. This means that the briefs we receive are sometimes woolly and impossible to achieve (especially in timescales and costs). Timings are a real bugbear within B2B International as we never want to compromise quality although our clients often seem to be being leaned on by their management in terms of timing leaving unrealistic timescales to collect and analyse the findings. However, the recession has resulted in companies becoming keener to understand the pressures their customers are facing – a greater recognition of the interdependence of theirs and their customers’ success.

2. Every job is put out to a long tender list

Gone are the days when we used to visit a client to take a brief and proposals were submitted from just three companies. Nowadays clients bash their briefs out to (sometimes) dozens of agencies. The competition has never been fiercer and prices as a result have been driven down with clients sometimes placing too much emphasis on cost rather than quality

3. We need to be increasingly imaginative about research methods

Gone are the days when we used to do surveys based on a simple research method. Increasingly we are given complex problems that have to be answered with a range of different research tools. It is not unusual for us nowadays to mix online surveys with telephone surveys and qualitative with quantitative.

4. We are required to be strategic consultant’s as well as data collectors

Gone are the days when market researchers simply researched a market. Today, in business to business markets we are expected to be familiar with all the business and marketing frameworks that traditionally were the ground of McKinsey and Bain.

5. We are increasingly required to use multidisciplinary teams

Gone are the days when a sole researcher could carry out a market research project from beginning to end on their own. B2B International has brought together a diverse team with specialist skills ranging from pure research backgrounds through to statisticians, computer programmers and consultants that can act in an advisory capacity upon completion of a project

As usual, during any recession, research providers who supply quality and value throughout the difficult times will emerge stronger and fitter. However, with organizations continually looking to measure ROI on every pound spent, is the competitive landscape for business to business research changed forever?



Beware all premium brands!

Tuesday, June 23rd, 2009


Post to Twitter Post to Facebook Post to LinkedIn

Received wisdom has always suggested that strong brands will withstand a recession. The argument goes that in a recession there is a flight to safety and strong brands represent safety.

An interesting study carried out amongst consumers in the US suggests exactly the opposite. A half of all the people who had previously been loyal to a brand appear to have reduced their loyalty or defected during 2008. They are switching to the value brands offered by major supermarkets.

This raises the question, “will the same thing happen in business to business markets?”.

There is a possibility that it will not – at least not in quite the same way. Supermarket brands have now become some of the most trusted in their own right.  For a number of years there has been a general migration to supermarket brands as people have recognised that the products in the supermarket packaging are quite probably made by the same companies that make premium brand products that cost 30% more.

Things are slightly different in industrial markets. The closest you get to the “supermarket brand” in industrial markets is usually referred to as a generic brand, a Chinese brand, an Eastern European brand etc. In fact, the word “reputation” is used just as often as brand.

However, it would be foolish and naive to think that business to business buyers and specifiers are slavishly buying products from their favoured suppliers at any price, without looking around. In the heady days before the recession it was not untypical to research a market and find that only 20% of companies were “price buyers”.  Today it would be unusual to find less than 30% price buyers in any business to business market. The shift to value is occurring everywhere.

Brands left to ponder price of loyalty

By Andrew Edgecliffe-Johnson in New York
Published: June 22 2009 03:00

Big brands’ best customers have been defecting in droves since the beginning of the US recession, according to a study. By this year, more than half of a typical US brand’s most loyal shoppers in 2007 had switched to rival products.

A two-year analysis of 685 grocery and pharmacy-stocked brands, using data from 32m consumers’ supermarket loyalty cards, found that in 2008 the average brand lost a third of its formerly highly loyal customers.

The study will alarm packaged goods groups, as the most loyal customers – those choosing one brand for more than 70 per cent of their purchases in a category – should also be their most lucrative.

"Defection is top of mind for brand managers now because they’re the most profitable customers," said Eric Anderson, associate professor of marketing at Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern University.

"Price and promotion have become so salient at retail, that what we thought was the loyal customer can be moved with discounts," he added.

Past recessions have seen similar defections from top-tier national brands to stores’ private-label goods, Mr Anderson said. Academic research showed that customers could be quickly persuaded to switch by a cheaper price but took far longer to switch back.

The study was conducted by the CMO Council, which represents chief marketing officers, and Catalina Marketing’s Pointer Media Network, which has equipment in 25,000 stores analysing buying behaviour.

Catalina can provide a two-year anonymous purchasing history on individual customers. Brand managers and retailers who had seen the data had been startled by it, said Todd Morris, senior vice-president at Catalina.

"They’ve always known there was churn but could never put their finger on how big the issue is."

The study comes as marketers are leaning more heavily on research and on targeted advertising, as they seek to improve on the "spray and pray" approach of mass media marketing formats, such as 30-second television advertisements.

The Financial Times Limited 2009



Next Entries »